Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NEVASANEVASA
VS
Bajaj FinservBajaj Finserv
NEVASA

NEVASA

Rosario Norte 555 piso 15, Las Condes, Santiago, CL

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nevasa.cl
753/1000Fair

Nevasa es un grupo de empresas que ofrece una amplia gama de productos y servicios financieros a sus clientes. En el año 1989, nace Negocios y Valores S.A. Corredores de Bolsa, con el objeto de satisfacer las crecientes necesidades de un importante grupo de personas, of...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:77
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bajaj Finserv

Bajaj Finserv

Bajaj Finserv House, Sakore Nagar Rd, Viman Nagar, Pune, 411014, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.bajajfinserv.in
815/1000Good

Founded in April 2007, Bajaj Finserv is the financial arm of the Bajaj group. We believe in a simple philosophy to never settle for good and go for great. This reflects in our extensive product portfolio that spans across 3 broad categories- lending, insurance and wealt...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:68,272
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NEVASA

NEVASA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bajaj Finserv

Bajaj Finserv

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NEVASA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bajaj Finserv in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - NEVASA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NEVASA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bajaj Finserv (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bajaj Finserv cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NEVASA

NEVASA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bajaj Finserv

Bajaj Finserv

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between NEVASA company and Bajaj Finserv company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NEVASA company and Bajaj Finserv company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NEVASA company and Bajaj Finserv company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NEVASA company and Bajaj Finserv company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NEVASA company and Bajaj Finserv company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NEVASA company and Bajaj Finserv company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NEVASA company and Bajaj Finserv company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NEVASA company and Bajaj Finserv company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NEVASA company and Bajaj Finserv company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NEVASA company and Bajaj Finserv company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NEVASA company and Bajaj Finserv company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NEVASA and Bajaj Finserv, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NEVASA and Bajaj Finserv, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NEVASA or Bajaj Finserv ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NEVASA or Bajaj Finserv ?
Between NEVASA and Bajaj Finserv, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NEVASA and Bajaj Finserv, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2