Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro CompanyNETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company
VS
Bouygues TelecomBouygues Telecom
NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company

NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company

231 Beverly Rd, Greenville, SC, 29609, US

Last Update: 27/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.netxusa.com
751/1000Fair

NETXUSA is a value added CPE distributor that provides process automation and outsourcing of CPE life cycle management to service providers and resellers who deploy managed cloud services to businesses in North America. NETXUSA implements its logistics and services v...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:15
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bouygues Telecom

Bouygues Telecom

13/15 avenue du Maréchal Juin, Meudon-la-Forêt, 92360, FR

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile

🤝Ce qui fait notre singularité ? Chez Bouygues Telecom, nous croyons que les relations humaines sont un besoin vital. La qualité de nos relations avec notre famille, nos amis, ceux qui nous entourent est déterminante pour notre bien-être, notre santé et même notre esp...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:11,942
Subsidiaries:111
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company

NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bouygues Telecom

Bouygues Telecom

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bouygues Telecom in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bouygues Telecom (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bouygues Telecom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company

NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bouygues Telecom

Bouygues Telecom

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BOU339080725

FAQ

Between NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company company and Bouygues Telecom company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company company and Bouygues Telecom company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company company and Bouygues Telecom company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company company and Bouygues Telecom company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company company and Bouygues Telecom company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company company and Bouygues Telecom company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company company and Bouygues Telecom company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company company and Bouygues Telecom company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company company and Bouygues Telecom company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company company and Bouygues Telecom company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company company and Bouygues Telecom company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company and Bouygues Telecom, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company and Bouygues Telecom, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company or Bouygues Telecom ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company or Bouygues Telecom ?
Between NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company and Bouygues Telecom, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NETXUSA - An Ingram Micro Company and Bouygues Telecom, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9