Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Netskope

Netskope Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

netskope.com

Netskope, a leader in modern security and networking, addresses the needs of both security and networking teams by providing optimized access and real-time, context-based security for people, devices, and data anywhere they go. Thousands of customers, including more than 30 of the Fortune 100, trust the Netskope One platform, its Zero Trust Engine, and its powerful NewEdge network to reduce risk and gain full visibility and control over cloud, AI, SaaS, web, and private applications—providing security and accelerating performance without trade-offs.


Netskope A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Netskope
Company Information
Website:https://www.netskope.com
Employees number:3,156
Number of followers:200,316
NAICS:541514
Industry Type:Computer and Network Security
Homepage:netskope.com
Netskope Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
logo
NetskopeComputer and Network Security
Updated:
09/03/2026
749/1000
Moderate
Ba
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Netskope Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
NetskopeComputer and Network Security
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Netskope
NetskopeModerate
Current Score
749Ba (MODERATE)
01000
1 incidents
-19 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
748Before Incident
MAY 2026
751Before Incident
APRIL 2026
751Before Incident
MARCH 2026
750Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
749Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
767Before Incident
Cyber Attack
13 Jan 2026Netskope
Netskope, Veza, TrojAI and Syntax: 2026 AI reckoning: Agent breaches, NHI sprawl, deepfakes

High-Profile AI Agent-Driven Breach

748After Incident
CRITICAL-19
NETVEZHIDSYN1768307855
AI Security Reckoning Looms in 2026 as Overprivileged Agents Spark Crisis Cybersecurity experts warn that 2026 could mark a turning point for AI-driven risks, as overhyped investments collide with unchecked automation and governance failures. Analysts predict the collapse of the AI bubble, fueled by economic unsustainability, technical vulnerabilities, and eroding digital trust with high-profile breaches shifting blame from human error to overprivileged AI agents and machine identities. Key Threats on the Horizon - AI Bubble Burst: Netskope’s Chief Scientist Mark Day forecasts a 2026 reckoning, where speculative AI projects collapse, leaving behind obsolete data centers and economic fallout worse than the dot-com crash. Only a fraction of real-world AI applications will survive, while overreaction and scapegoating follow. - Agentic AI Breaches: Syntax Global CISO Jack Cherkas highlights early signs of trouble autonomous AI agents in corporate workflows have already caused data leaks, hallucinated outputs in regulated environments, and unvalidated transactions. A major breach in 2026, traced to misconfigured agents, could trigger senior leadership dismissals and a crisis of confidence in automation. - Agency Abuse as the New Attack Vector: Veza’s Rob Rachwald warns of "agency abuse," where attackers exploit AI agents’ excessive permissions to execute destructive actions such as deleting production environments or exfiltrating data under the guise of routine tasks. By 2026, these manipulations will evolve into a predictable class of attacks, bypassing traditional security controls. - Identity as the Battleground: AI agents with unsupervised access via overprivileged API keys or misconfigured tokens will become the next insider threat. A single breach could expose sensitive data at scale, forcing enterprises to extend identity governance to algorithms, enforcing least-privilege policies and behavior monitoring. - Deepfake-Driven Disruption: Ilumio’s Gary Barlet predicts a 2026 deepfake crisis, where AI-generated misinformation disrupts markets and public trust. Governments and enterprises will accelerate content authenticity standards, watermarking, and verification tools to counter the threat. - Shadow IT 2.0: TrojAI’s Lee Weiner notes that multi-agent workflows developed rapidly by "vibe coding" teams will introduce new attack surfaces, including cascading risks and context poisoning. Most AI incidents will stem from unsafe outputs, misalignment, or oversharing, outpacing security teams’ ability to manage them. Nation-State Exploitation Attackers will increasingly target identity-based vulnerabilities, using credential phishing and lateral movement to infiltrate supply chains and critical infrastructure. Nation-states are expected to weaponize stolen credentials and federated tokens, prioritizing energy grids, healthcare, and financial networks. The convergence of these risks in 2026 will force enterprises to treat AI security as a governance issue, implementing granular access controls, provenance tracking, and continuous monitoring or face systemic failures with real-world consequences.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
AI-driven breachInsider threatData exfiltrationOperational disruption
MOTIVATION
Data exfiltrationOperational disruptionFinancial gainSupply chain infiltrationMisinformation
IMPACT
Financial Loss: High (e.g., thousands of dollars in token burn, ransom demands, or operational costs)Sensitive dataProduction databasesPersonally identifiable information (PII)Regulated dataAI copilotsAutonomous agentsCode repositoriesTicketing systemsCloud environmentsProduction environmentsDowntime: Potential significant downtime (e.g., deleted production environments)Disrupted workflowsUnauthorized transactionsData leaksHallucinated outputs in regulated environmentsRevenue Loss: Potential high revenue loss due to operational disruptions or reputational damageCustomer Complaints: Likely increase due to data exposure or service disruptionsBrand Reputation Impact: Severe (loss of public confidence in AI automation)Legal Liabilities: High (regulatory violations, fines, legal actions)Identity Theft Risk: High (exposure of PII or sensitive data)
DATA BREACH
Sensitive business dataProduction databasesPIIRegulated dataSensitivity Of Data: High (e.g., healthcare records, financial data, intellectual property)Data Exfiltration: Yes (e.g., backups transferred to external storage under false pretenses)DatabasesCode repositoriesDocumentsBackup filesPersonally Identifiable Information: Likely (depending on the breach)
DECEMBER 2025
767Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
767Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
767Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
767Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
767Before Incident
JULY 2025
767Before Incident

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Netskope ?
?
What was Netskope's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Netskope's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Netskope's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Netskope's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Netskope's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Netskope's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Netskope's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Netskope's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Netskope's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Netskope's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was Netskope's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Netskope's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Netskope ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Netskope's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?