Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Netlify

Netlify Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

netlify.com

Build with AI or code, deploy instantly on a platform built for agent experience (AX). AI makes it easy to generate code. The harder part comes next. Getting changes live. Keeping systems stable. Understanding what broke when something doesn’t behave as expected. That challenge grows as updates happen faster and more often. That’s the gap we’re closing. Netlify brings more of the development workflow into one platform so developers and agents can move from idea to production quickly, without losing context. We coined this agent experience (AX), a shared workflow where humans and AI agents work side by side and take responsibility for shipping quality software. As pioneers of the Jamstack movement, we bring together all modern web


Netlify A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Netlify
Company Information
Website:https://www.netlify.com
Employees number:183
Number of followers:35,854
NAICS:5112
Industry Type:Software Development
Homepage:netlify.com
Netlify Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
logo
NetlifySoftware Development
Updated:
07/05/2026
722/1000
Moderate
Ba
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Netlify Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
NetlifySoftware Development
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Netlify
NetlifyModerate
Current Score
722Ba (MODERATE)
01000
2 incidents
-15.5 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
724Before Incident
MAY 2026
728Before Incident
Vulnerability
04 May 2026Netlify
Lovable, Base44, Replit, Netlify and FedEx: AI vibe-coding apps leak sensitive data

AI Coding Tools Expose Sensitive Data in Massive Security Oversight

722After Incident
CRITICAL-6
FEDLOVBASNETREP1778156932
AI Coding Tools Expose Sensitive Data in Massive Security Oversight Israeli cybersecurity firm RedAccess uncovered over 380,000 publicly accessible applications built using low-code and AI-powered tools from Lovable, Base44, Replit, and Netlify, including roughly 5,000 containing sensitive corporate and personal data. The findings, shared with Axios on Monday, highlight how employees without cybersecurity training are inadvertently exposing confidential information through misconfigured privacy settings. RedAccess CEO Dor Zvi revealed the apps were discovered while investigating "shadow AI" unauthorized use of AI tools by employees. Many applications were set to public by default, requiring manual adjustments to restrict access. Some exposed data included: - Medical records (doctor-patient conversations, clinical trial details, hospital staff schedules) - Financial data (internal bank records, customer service logs) - Corporate intelligence (shipping vessel routes, internal incident reports) - Phishing sites impersonating brands like Bank of America, FedEx, and McDonald’s Representatives from the affected platforms responded with mixed reactions. Base44 accused RedAccess of withholding URLs needed for verification, while Lovable acknowledged the reports but noted they lacked technical specifics to act immediately. Replit emphasized that users control app visibility, with CEO Amjad Masad stating RedAccess gave only 24 hours’ notice before public disclosure. Netlify did not respond to requests for comment. Security researchers confirmed that many exposed apps were indexed by Google, making them easily discoverable. Axios independently verified several cases, including: - A hospital app with unredacted patient complaints and staff schedules - A Brazilian bank’s internal financial records - A school app containing lesson recordings and student data The incident underscores how AI-driven "vibe coding" tools designed for non-technical users are enabling rapid, large-scale data exposure. As Zvi noted, the lack of built-in safeguards means even basic security oversights can lead to unintentional public leaks of critical information. Some exposed apps were taken down after companies were notified, but the broader issue of unauthorized AI tool usage in enterprises remains unaddressed.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Exposure
MOTIVATION
Unintentional exposure by employees
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Sensitive corporate and personal dataSystems Affected: 380,000+ applications built using Lovable, Base44, Replit, and NetlifyOperational Impact: Exposure of internal records and systemsBrand Reputation Impact: Potential brand reputation damage for affected entitiesLegal Liabilities: Potential legal liabilities due to data exposureIdentity Theft Risk: HighPayment Information Risk: High (for financial data exposed)
DATA BREACH
Medical recordsFinancial dataCorporate intelligencePhishing sitesInternal bank recordsCustomer service logsShipping vessel routesInternal incident reportsPatient complaintsStaff schedulesLesson recordingsStudent dataNumber Of Records Exposed: Roughly 5,000 applications with sensitive dataSensitivity Of Data: HighPersonally Identifiable Information: Yes
MAY 2026
753Before Incident
Cyber Attack
01 May 2026Netlify
Google, Vercel, Netlify, Canva and Adobe: 30,000 Facebook Accounts Hacked via Google AppSheet Phishing Campaign

Vietnamese-Linked Phishing Operation Hijacks 30,000 Facebook Accounts via Google AppSheet

728After Incident
LOW-25
CANADOGOONETVER1777660893
Vietnamese-Linked Phishing Operation Hijacks 30,000 Facebook Accounts via Google AppSheet A newly uncovered cybercriminal operation, dubbed AccountDumpling by Guardio Labs, has exploited Google AppSheet as a phishing relay to compromise approximately 30,000 Facebook accounts. The campaign, attributed to Vietnamese threat actors, targets business account owners with deceptive emails impersonating Meta Support, warning of imminent account deletion unless users submit an appeal. The attack begins with phishing emails sent from a Google AppSheet address ([email protected]), bypassing spam filters by leveraging the platform’s legitimacy. Victims are directed to fake Meta-branded pages hosted on Netlify, Vercel, or disguised as Google Drive PDFs where they are tricked into entering credentials, two-factor authentication (2FA) codes, government ID photos, and other sensitive data. Stolen information is exfiltrated to attacker-controlled Telegram channels, which collectively hold records from victims across the U.S., Italy, Canada, the Philippines, and other countries. The operation employs multiple lures, including: - Fake Meta appeals (e.g., account disablement, copyright complaints, or verification reviews). - Blue badge evaluation scams, using bogus CAPTCHA checks to harvest credentials. - Google Drive-hosted PDFs (created via Canva) that mimic verification instructions. - Fake job offers impersonating companies like Meta, WhatsApp, and Adobe to build trust before redirecting victims to malicious sites. Metadata from the Canva-generated PDFs led researchers to a Vietnamese individual, PHẠM TÀI TÂN, whose website (phamtaitan[.]vn) advertises digital marketing services. Open-source intelligence suggests the operation is part of a broader underground economy where stolen Facebook accounts along with associated ad reputations and recovery access are monetized through illicit storefronts. The campaign reflects a growing trend of Vietnamese threat actors repurposing trusted platforms (e.g., Google AppSheet, Netlify, Vercel) to scale phishing attacks, highlighting the commodification of compromised social media assets in cybercrime markets.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Phishing
MOTIVATION
Financial gain (monetization of stolen Facebook accounts, ad reputations, and recovery access)
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Facebook account credentials, 2FA codes, government ID photos, personally identifiable information (PII)Systems Affected: Facebook accounts (business and personal)Operational Impact: Loss of access to Facebook accounts, potential misuse of accounts for further scams or ad fraudBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage to Meta (Facebook) due to impersonation and account hijackingIdentity Theft Risk: High (government ID photos and PII exposed)
DATA BREACH
Credentials2FA codesGovernment ID photosPersonally identifiable information (PII)Number Of Records Exposed: 30,000 accountsSensitivity Of Data: High (PII, government IDs, authentication data)Data Exfiltration: Yes (stolen data sent to attacker-controlled Telegram channels)PDFs (fake verification instructions)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (government ID photos, account details)
APRIL 2026
753Before Incident
MARCH 2026
753Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
753Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
753Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
753Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
753Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
753Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
753Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
753Before Incident
JULY 2025
753Before Incident

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Netlify ?
?
What was Netlify's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Netlify's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Netlify's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Netlify's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Netlify's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Netlify's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Netlify's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Netlify's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Netlify's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Netlify's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was Netlify's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Netlify's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Netlify ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Netlify's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?