Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NetlifyNetlify
VS
ByteDanceByteDance
Netlify

Netlify

101 2nd St, San Francisco, 94105, US

Last Update: 07/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.netlify.com
722/1000Moderate

Build with AI or code, deploy instantly on a platform built for agent experience (AX). AI makes it easy to generate code. The harder part comes next. Getting changes live. Keeping systems stable. Understanding what broke when something doesn’t behave as expected. That ...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:183
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
ByteDance

ByteDance

China, 100098, CN

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
802/1000Good

ByteDance is a global incubator of platforms at the cutting edge of commerce, content, entertainment and enterprise services - over 2.5bn people interact with ByteDance products including TikTok. Creation is the core of ByteDance's purpose. Our products are built to he...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:46,475
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Netlify

Netlify

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ByteDance

ByteDance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Netlify has 88.68% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ByteDance in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Netlify (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Netlify cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ByteDance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ByteDance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Netlify

Netlify

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
FEDLOVBASNETREP1778156932
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CANADOGOONETVER1777660893
ByteDance

ByteDance

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BYT000012225

FAQ

Between Netlify company and ByteDance company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Netlify company and ByteDance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Netlify company and ByteDance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Netlify company and ByteDance company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Netlify company and ByteDance company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Netlify company and ByteDance company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Netlify company and ByteDance company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Netlify company and ByteDance company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Netlify company and ByteDance company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Netlify company and ByteDance company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Netlify company and ByteDance company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Netlify and ByteDance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Netlify and ByteDance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Netlify or ByteDance ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Netlify or ByteDance ?
Between Netlify and ByteDance, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Netlify and ByteDance, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA