Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NETGEARNETGEAR
VS
DoorDashDoorDash
NETGEAR

NETGEAR

3553 N First Street, San Jose, 95134, US

Last Update: 04/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.netgear.com
721/1000Moderate

We turn ideas into innovative networking products that connect people, power businesses, and advance the way we live. For Home NETGEAR makes it easy for you to have the smartest home in the neighborhood, with the latest, fastest networking technology products. From th...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:1,420
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
DoorDash

DoorDash

San Francisco, California, US

Last Update: 11/06/2026

View Profile
609/1000Poor

At DoorDash, our mission to empower local economies shapes how our team members move quickly and always learn and reiterate to support merchants, Dashers and the communities we serve. We are a technology and logistics company that started with door-to-door delivery, and...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:76,630
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
9
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NETGEAR

NETGEAR

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DoorDash

DoorDash

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

NETGEAR has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

DoorDash has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - NETGEAR (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NETGEAR cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DoorDash (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DoorDash cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NETGEAR

NETGEAR

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
TENTP-NET1772144683
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DLINET1775644215
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
NETVERDLITHE1780583187
DoorDash

DoorDash

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
WOFAUBWALDOO1772749980
🔒 Incident : Breach
DOO5993759111725
🔒 Incident : Breach
DOO4104241112725

FAQ

Between NETGEAR company and DoorDash company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NETGEAR company and DoorDash company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NETGEAR company and DoorDash company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NETGEAR company and DoorDash company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NETGEAR company and DoorDash company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NETGEAR company and DoorDash company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NETGEAR company and DoorDash company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NETGEAR company and DoorDash company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NETGEAR company and DoorDash company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NETGEAR company and DoorDash company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NETGEAR company and DoorDash company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NETGEAR and DoorDash, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NETGEAR and DoorDash, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NETGEAR or DoorDash ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NETGEAR or DoorDash ?
Between NETGEAR and DoorDash, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NETGEAR and DoorDash, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA