Comparison Overview
NETGEAR Benelux

NETGEAR Benelux
Louis Braillelaan 80, Zoetermeer, South Holland, 2719, NL
Last Update: 03/04/2026
Bij NETGEAR zetten wij ideeën om in innovatieve netwerkproducten waarmee mensen worden verbonden, bedrijven worden ondersteund, en de manier waarop we leven wordt verbeterd. Gebruiksvriendelijk. Krachtig. Slim. En speciaal voor u ontworpen. Voor thuis: NETGEAR maakt he...

Verizon
One Verizon Way, Basking Ridge, NJ, US, 07920-1097
Last Update: 07/06/2026
We get you. You want more out of a career. A place to share your ideas freely — even if they’re daring or different. Where the true you can learn, grow, and thrive. You’ll find all that here. Because we empower you. We power and empower how people live, work and play ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

NETGEAR Benelux







Verizon






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for NETGEAR Benelux in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
Verizon has 371.7% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - NETGEAR Benelux (X = Date, Y = Severity)
NETGEAR Benelux cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Verizon (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Verizon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

NETGEAR Benelux

Verizon
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.