Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Nestlé Waters & Premium BeveragesNestlé Waters & Premium Beverages
VS
Perfetti Van MellePerfetti Van Melle
Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages

Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages

12 Boulevard Garibaldi, Paris, Issy-les-Moulineaux, 92130, FR

Last Update: 10/11/2025

View Profile
785/1000Fair

Nestlé Waters - The Healthy Hydration Company, created in 1992, is the water division of the Nestlé Group and the number one bottled water company worldwide. Our product portfolio consists of 50 unique brands with water making up approximately 89% of our product portfol...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:7,020
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Perfetti Van Melle

Perfetti Van Melle

Stationsplein ZW 997, SCHIPHOL OOST, 1117 CE, NL

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
798/1000Fair

Perfetti Van Melle is a privately owned company, producing and distributing candies and chewing gums in more than 150 countries worldwide. Employing over 17.000 people and operating 37 companies throughout the world, Perfetti Van Melle has a true global reach: it is p...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:11,469
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages

Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Perfetti Van Melle

Perfetti Van Melle

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Perfetti Van Melle in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Perfetti Van Melle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Perfetti Van Melle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages

Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Perfetti Van Melle

Perfetti Van Melle

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages and Perfetti Van Melle, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages and Perfetti Van Melle, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages or Perfetti Van Melle ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages or Perfetti Van Melle ?
Between Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages and Perfetti Van Melle, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Nestlé Waters & Premium Beverages and Perfetti Van Melle, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA