Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Neptune Benson, XylemNeptune Benson, Xylem
VS
Rencol Components Ltd.Rencol Components Ltd.
Neptune Benson, Xylem

Neptune Benson, Xylem

334 Knight St, Warwick, Rhode Island, 02886, US

Last Update: 14/02/2026

View Profile
744/1000Moderate

Commercial Water Filtration - Disinfection - Circulation Accessories Neptune Benson, Xylem has been synonymous with water filtration and disinfection serving the recreational market since 1956. Featuring award-winning brands such as the Defender® regenerative media fil...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:42
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Rencol Components Ltd.

Rencol Components Ltd.

Unit 2, Avonbridge Trading Estate, Bristol, BS11 9QD, GB

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.rencol.com
833/1000Good

Following 100 years of successful design and manufacturing experience in plastic and metals, Rencol Components has built a truly global supply chain - rapidly expanding our range of high-quality, competitively-priced industrial components. Rencol has developed a mature...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:11,548
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Neptune Benson, Xylem

Neptune Benson, Xylem

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rencol Components Ltd.

Rencol Components Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Neptune Benson, Xylem in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rencol Components Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Neptune Benson, Xylem (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Neptune Benson, Xylem cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rencol Components Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rencol Components Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Neptune Benson, Xylem

Neptune Benson, Xylem

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Rencol Components Ltd.

Rencol Components Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Neptune Benson, Xylem company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Neptune Benson, Xylem company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Neptune Benson, Xylem company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Neptune Benson, Xylem company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Neptune Benson, Xylem company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Neptune Benson, Xylem company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Neptune Benson, Xylem company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Neptune Benson, Xylem company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Neptune Benson, Xylem company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Neptune Benson, Xylem company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Neptune Benson, Xylem company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Neptune Benson, Xylem and Rencol Components Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Neptune Benson, Xylem and Rencol Components Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Neptune Benson, Xylem or Rencol Components Ltd. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Neptune Benson, Xylem or Rencol Components Ltd. ?
Between Neptune Benson, Xylem and Rencol Components Ltd., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Neptune Benson, Xylem and Rencol Components Ltd., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1