Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NEP AustraliaNEP Australia
VS
ESPNESPN
NEP Australia

NEP Australia

Level 3, 8 Central Ave, Eveleigh, NSW, 2015, AU

Last Update: 15/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.nepgroup.com.au/
759/1000Fair

For more than 30 years we've been the broadcast industry's first choice for project delivery. Our business build on lasting relationships and we proudly work with all of Australia's commercial and subscription TV networks and leading independent production companies. We...

NAICS:515
NAICS Definition:Broadcasting (except Internet)
Employees:279
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ESPN

ESPN

1 ESPN Plaza, Bristol, 06010, US

Last Update: 21/10/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://espncareers.com
692/1000Weak

ESPN is the leading multiplatform sports entertainment brand that features seven U.S. television networks, the leading sports app, direct-to-consumer ESPN+, leading social and digital platforms, ESPN.com, ESPN Audio, endeavors on every continent around the world, and mo...

NAICS:515
NAICS Definition:Broadcasting (except Internet)
Employees:11,747
Subsidiaries:58
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NEP Australia

NEP Australia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ESPN

ESPN

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Broadcast Media Production and Distribution Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NEP Australia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Broadcast Media Production and Distribution Industry Avg (This Year)

ESPN has 1.96% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - NEP Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NEP Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ESPN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ESPN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NEP Australia

NEP Australia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ESPN

ESPN

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ESPTHEABC1792594127

FAQ

Between NEP Australia company and ESPN company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NEP Australia company and ESPN company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NEP Australia company and ESPN company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NEP Australia company and ESPN company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NEP Australia company and ESPN company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NEP Australia company and ESPN company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NEP Australia company and ESPN company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NEP Australia company and ESPN company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NEP Australia company and ESPN company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NEP Australia company and ESPN company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NEP Australia company and ESPN company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NEP Australia and ESPN, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NEP Australia and ESPN, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NEP Australia or ESPN ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NEP Australia or ESPN ?
Between NEP Australia and ESPN, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NEP Australia and ESPN, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9