Comparison Overview
Neoclinical
Neoclinical
Level 6, Surry Hills, Sydney, 2010, AU
Last Update: 29/03/2026
Every day more patients are registering with Neoclinical to learn about and participate in clinical trials. Right now we have tens of thousands of patients who've supplied their contact and medical details along with full privacy consent to be contacted for your clin...
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
304, Atlanta Arcade Marol Church Road, Mumbai, 400059, IN
Last Update: 13/09/2026
A vertically integrated, Global Pharmaceutical Company. Established in 1989, we are engaged in developing, manufacturing, and marketing a wide range of formulations across several major therapeutic areas including anti-infectives, cardiovascular, anti-diabetic, dermato...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Neoclinical
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Neoclinical in 2026.
Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. in 2026.
Incident History - Neoclinical (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Neoclinical cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Neoclinical
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.