Comparison Overview
Neo Reply

Neo Reply
Bartholomäusweg 26, Gütersloh, 33334, DE
Last Update: 20/12/2025
Wir sind Neo Reply. Wir helfen Marken und Unternehmen, ihre Digital Experience Strategie Realität werden zu lassen. Mit jahrzehntelanger Erfahrung rund um Digital Experience Plattformen (mit Fokus auf die DXP FirstSpirit), unterstützen wir unsere Kunden auf der ganzen ...

Atos
80 Quai Voltaire, 95877 Bezons, FR
Last Update: 03/04/2026
Atos Group is a global leader in digital transformation with c. 67,000 employees and annual revenue of c. €10 billion, operating in 61 countries under two brands — Atos for services and Eviden for products. European number one in cybersecurity, cloud and high performanc...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Neo Reply







Atos






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Neo Reply in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Atos in 2026.
Incident History - Neo Reply (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Neo Reply cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Atos (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Atos cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Neo Reply

Atos
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Glance through 32.0.0, the /v2/tasks API accepts type=import tasks that bypass import_filtering_opts, allowing an admin to fetch internal URLs from the Glance service network (aka SSRF), as long as https:// or http:// is used. This API has been available only to admins since Xena, and it has been deprecated for several releases.
SPIP before 4.4.20 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, as exploited in the wild in August 2026. This is related to incorrect identification of <?php blocks, and var_export's mishandling of certain cases such as presence of a '<' character.
Path traversal in apport-unpack in Canonical Apport before 2.36.0, 2.34.2, and 2.28.4 on Linux allows an attacker to create or overwrite arbitrary files with the privileges of the executing user via an attacker controlled key names in crash report files.
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been reported in PTC Windchill PDMLink and PTC FlexPLM. The vulnerability may be exploited through the deserialization of untrusted data.
A critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability has been reported in PTC Windchill and PTC FlexPLM. The vulnerability may be exploited through the deserialization of untrusted data.