Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Neenah Fine Paper & PackagingNeenah Fine Paper & Packaging
VS
AB InBevAB InBev
Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging

Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging

3460 Preston Ridge Rd, Alpharetta, Georgia, 30005, US

Last Update: 05/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.neenahpaper.com
755/1000Fair

Built upon a tradition of innovation, commitment, and pride, Neenah has been helping world-class brands for over 140 years.

NAICS:339
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:1
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AB InBev

AB InBev

Brouwerijplein 1, Leuven, BE, 3000

Last Update: 03/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.ab-inbev.com/
821/1000Good

As a company, we dream big to create a future with more cheers. We are always looking to serve up new ways to meet life’s moments, move our industry forward and make a meaningful impact in the world. We are committed to building great brands that stand the test of time ...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:140,021
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging

Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AB InBev

AB InBev

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AB InBev in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AB InBev (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AB InBev cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging

Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AB InBev

AB InBev

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging company and AB InBev company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging company and AB InBev company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging company and AB InBev company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging company and AB InBev company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging company and AB InBev company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging company and AB InBev company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging company and AB InBev company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging company and AB InBev company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging company and AB InBev company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging company and AB InBev company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging company and AB InBev company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging and AB InBev, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging and AB InBev, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging or AB InBev ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging or AB InBev ?
Between Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging and AB InBev, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Neenah Fine Paper & Packaging and AB InBev, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA