Comparison Overview
NEC Philippines, Inc.

NEC Philippines, Inc.
111 Paseo de Roxas, 7th Floor 111 Paseo de Roxas Building, Makati, National Capital Region, PH, 1229
Last Update: 01/03/2026
NEC Philippines, Inc. (NECPH) was incorporated on January 18, 1996, though prior to this, NEC was already present in the Philippines through its Manila Representative Office since the 1960s. NECPH provides products and solutions in the Philippines for over 25 years, off...

Serco
16 Bartley Wood Business Park, Bartley Way, Hook, RG27 9UY, GB
Last Update: 03/04/2026
We bring together the right people, the right technology and the right partners to create innovative solutions that make positive impact and address some of the most urgent and complex challenges facing the modern world. With a focus on serving governments globally, ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

NEC Philippines, Inc.







Serco






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for NEC Philippines, Inc. in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Serco in 2026.
Incident History - NEC Philippines, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
NEC Philippines, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Serco (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Serco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

NEC Philippines, Inc.

Serco
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.