Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NEC Philippines, Inc.NEC Philippines, Inc.
VS
LTIMindtreeLTIMindtree
NEC Philippines, Inc.

NEC Philippines, Inc.

111 Paseo de Roxas, 7th Floor 111 Paseo de Roxas Building, Makati, National Capital Region, PH, 1229

Last Update: 01/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://ph.nec.com
751/1000Fair

NEC Philippines, Inc. (NECPH) was incorporated on January 18, 1996, though prior to this, NEC was already present in the Philippines through its Manila Representative Office since the 1960s. NECPH provides products and solutions in the Philippines for over 25 years, off...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:113
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
LTIMindtree

LTIMindtree

L&T Infotech, Technology Tower. Gate No. 5, Saki Vihar Road, Powai, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400072, IN, Mumbai, MH, IN, 400072

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ltimindtree.com
786/1000Fair

LTIMindtree is a global technology consulting and digital solutions company that partners with enterprises across industries to reimagine business models, accelerate innovation, and drive AI-centric growth. Trusted by more than 700 clients worldwide, we use advanced tec...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:114,189
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NEC Philippines, Inc.

NEC Philippines, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
LTIMindtree

LTIMindtree

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NEC Philippines, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LTIMindtree in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - NEC Philippines, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NEC Philippines, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - LTIMindtree (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LTIMindtree cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NEC Philippines, Inc.

NEC Philippines, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
LTIMindtree

LTIMindtree

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between NEC Philippines, Inc. company and LTIMindtree company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NEC Philippines, Inc. company and LTIMindtree company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NEC Philippines, Inc. company and LTIMindtree company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NEC Philippines, Inc. company and LTIMindtree company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NEC Philippines, Inc. company and LTIMindtree company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NEC Philippines, Inc. company and LTIMindtree company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NEC Philippines, Inc. company and LTIMindtree company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NEC Philippines, Inc. company and LTIMindtree company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NEC Philippines, Inc. company and LTIMindtree company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NEC Philippines, Inc. company and LTIMindtree company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NEC Philippines, Inc. company and LTIMindtree company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NEC Philippines, Inc. and LTIMindtree, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NEC Philippines, Inc. and LTIMindtree, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NEC Philippines, Inc. or LTIMindtree ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NEC Philippines, Inc. or LTIMindtree ?
Between NEC Philippines, Inc. and LTIMindtree, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NEC Philippines, Inc. and LTIMindtree, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA