Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland)NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland)
VS
MTS GroupMTS Group
NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland)

NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland)

Odyssey Business Park, , South Ruislip , London, HA4 6QE, GB

Last Update: 06/12/2025

View Profile
751/1000Fair

At NEC we work with small, medium and enterprise sized businesses, providing Communication & IT Solutions for over 75 million users worldwide. Our UK-based team and network of NEC Partners are dedicated to empowering your business communications, productivity and custo...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:21
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
MTS Group

MTS Group

Moscow, RU

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.mts.ru
772/1000Fair

Mobile TeleSystems OJSC ("MTS") is the leading telecommunications group in Russia, Eastern Europe and Central Asia, offering mobile and fixed voice, broadband, pay TV as well as content and entertainment services in one of the world's fastest growing regions. Including ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:10,460
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland)

NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MTS Group

MTS Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MTS Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MTS Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MTS Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland)

NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
MTS Group

MTS Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland) company and MTS Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland) company and MTS Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland) company and MTS Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland) company and MTS Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland) company and MTS Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland) company and MTS Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland) company and MTS Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland) company and MTS Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland) company and MTS Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland) company and MTS Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland) company and MTS Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland) and MTS Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland) and MTS Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland) or MTS Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland) or MTS Group ?
Between NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland) and MTS Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NEC Enterprise Solutions (UK & Ireland) and MTS Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA