Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

National Dental Centre SingaporeNational Dental Centre Singapore
VS
Provincial Health Services AuthorityProvincial Health Services Authority
National Dental Centre Singapore

National Dental Centre Singapore

5 Second Hospital Avenue, Singapore , 168938, SG

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ndcs.com.sg
762/1000Fair

The National Dental Centre Singapore (NDCS) is the largest specialty centre for oral healthcare. Our teams of clinicians provide a one-stop comprehensive range of multi-disciplinary and integrated care for patients. NDCS leads in the training of dental professionals in ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:221
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Provincial Health Services Authority

Provincial Health Services Authority

200-1333 West Broadway, Vancouver, V6H 4C1, CA

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.phsa.ca
781/1000Fair

Canada's first provincial health services authority. Provincial Health Services Authority (PHSA) is one of six health authorities – the other five health authorities serve geographic regions of BC. PHSA's primary role is to ensure that BC residents have access to a coo...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:11,531
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
National Dental Centre Singapore

National Dental Centre Singapore

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Provincial Health Services Authority

Provincial Health Services Authority

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Dental Centre Singapore in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Provincial Health Services Authority in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - National Dental Centre Singapore (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Dental Centre Singapore cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Provincial Health Services Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Provincial Health Services Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
National Dental Centre Singapore

National Dental Centre Singapore

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Provincial Health Services Authority

Provincial Health Services Authority

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between National Dental Centre Singapore company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between National Dental Centre Singapore company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between National Dental Centre Singapore company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between National Dental Centre Singapore company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between National Dental Centre Singapore company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between National Dental Centre Singapore company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between National Dental Centre Singapore company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between National Dental Centre Singapore company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between National Dental Centre Singapore company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between National Dental Centre Singapore company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between National Dental Centre Singapore company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between National Dental Centre Singapore and Provincial Health Services Authority, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between National Dental Centre Singapore and Provincial Health Services Authority, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - National Dental Centre Singapore or Provincial Health Services Authority ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - National Dental Centre Singapore or Provincial Health Services Authority ?
Between National Dental Centre Singapore and Provincial Health Services Authority, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between National Dental Centre Singapore and Provincial Health Services Authority, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2