Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population SciencesNCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences
VS
INSSINSS
NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences

NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences

9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, 20850, US

Last Update: 29/01/2026

View Profile
761/1000Fair

As NCI’s bridge to public health research, practice, and policy, the Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences (DCCPS) plays a unique role in reducing the burden of cancer in America. DCCPS has the lead responsibility at NCI for supporting research in surveilla...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:48
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
INSS

INSS

SAS, Quadra 2, Bloco O, Brasília, 70070-907, BR

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.inss.gov.br
757/1000Fair

O Instituto Nacional do Seguro Social (INSS) é uma autarquia do Governo Federal do Brasil que recebe as contribuições para a manutenção do Regime Geral da Previdência Social, sendo responsável pelo pagamento da aposentadoria, pensão por morte, auxílio-doença, auxílio-ac...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:17,778
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences

NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
INSS

INSS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

INSS has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - INSS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

INSS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences

NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
INSS

INSS

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BININSGOO1773253647

FAQ

Between NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences company and INSS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences company and INSS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences company and INSS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences company and INSS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences company and INSS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences company and INSS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences company and INSS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences company and INSS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences company and INSS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences company and INSS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences company and INSS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences and INSS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences and INSS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences or INSS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences or INSS ?
Between NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences and INSS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences and INSS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1