Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NBM RailwaysNBM Railways
VS
CSXCSX
NBM Railways

NBM Railways

11 Gifford Road, Saint John, New Brunswick, E2M 4X8, CA

Last Update: 03/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.nbmrailways.com/
754/1000Fair

NBM Railways is a group of short-line railways (New Brunswick Southern, Eastern Maine, and Maine Northern) proudly operating since 1995. Headquartered in Saint John, NB, with operations in Mattawamkeag, ME and Oakfield, ME, we maintain and operate over 550 miles/885km o...

NAICS:482
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:52
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
CSX

CSX

500 Water Street, None, Jacksonville, FL, US, 32202

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.csx.com
824/1000Good

CSX is a company on the move. As the nation’s best run railroad, we’re redefining freight rail with a progressive vision and real results – setting new industry performance standards and building a force of highly skilled professionals who are energized to help us move ...

NAICS:482
NAICS Definition:Rail Transportation
Employees:12,763
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NBM Railways

NBM Railways

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CSX

CSX

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Rail Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NBM Railways in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Rail Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CSX in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - NBM Railways (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NBM Railways cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CSX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CSX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NBM Railways

NBM Railways

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
CSX

CSX

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CSX201072525

FAQ

Between NBM Railways company and CSX company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NBM Railways company and CSX company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NBM Railways company and CSX company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NBM Railways company and CSX company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NBM Railways company and CSX company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NBM Railways company and CSX company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NBM Railways company and CSX company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NBM Railways company and CSX company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NBM Railways company and CSX company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NBM Railways company and CSX company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NBM Railways company and CSX company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NBM Railways and CSX, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NBM Railways and CSX, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NBM Railways or CSX ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NBM Railways or CSX ?
Between NBM Railways and CSX, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NBM Railways and CSX, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8