Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NayaxNayax
VS
Aboitiz GroupAboitiz Group
Nayax

Nayax

3 Arik Einstein St, Herzliya, 4659071, IL

Last Update: 08/07/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.nayax.com
698/1000Weak

Welcome to Nayax, a global fintech company (NASDAQ; TASE: NYAX) dedicated to providing businesses with a comprehensive payment platform and management system for their operation. Since 2005, we've been at the forefront of the cashless payment revolution, offering innova...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:1,079
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Aboitiz Group

Aboitiz Group

Ayala Triangle Gardens Tower 2, Makati City, PH

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aboitiz.com
781/1000Fair

Here at Aboitiz, we aim to change today to shape the future. With five generations of success behind us, the Aboitiz Group is currently transforming into the Philippines’ first techglomerate. Amidst this evolution, we remain committed to our core mission of driving cha...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:11,871
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Nayax

Nayax

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Aboitiz Group

Aboitiz Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Nayax has 45.65% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aboitiz Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Nayax (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nayax cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Aboitiz Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aboitiz Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Nayax

Nayax

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NAY1783513897
Aboitiz Group

Aboitiz Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Nayax company and Aboitiz Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Nayax company and Aboitiz Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Nayax company and Aboitiz Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Nayax company and Aboitiz Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Nayax company and Aboitiz Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Nayax company and Aboitiz Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Nayax company and Aboitiz Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Nayax company and Aboitiz Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Nayax company and Aboitiz Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Nayax company and Aboitiz Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Nayax company and Aboitiz Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Nayax and Aboitiz Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Nayax and Aboitiz Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Nayax or Aboitiz Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Nayax or Aboitiz Group ?
Between Nayax and Aboitiz Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Nayax and Aboitiz Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA