Comparison Overview
Nayatel Cloud

Nayatel Cloud
73-E, GD Arcade, Fazal-E-Haq Road,, islamabad, 44000, PK
Last Update: 27/04/2026
Nayatel’s fiber to the home (FTTH) networks have transformed Islamabad, Rawalpindi, Faisalabad and Peshawar into one of the most connected and optically wired cities of the world. Being truly customer-centric, Nayatel has re-written the quality of service parameters and...

TELUS
510 West Georgia St., Vancouver, British Columbia, CA, V6B 0M3
Last Update: 23/06/2026
At TELUS, our purpose-driven team works together every day to innovate and do good. From providing technology solutions that make our lives safer and easier, to supporting those who need it most, our inclusive, spirited and giving people are passionate about empowering ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Nayatel Cloud







TELUS






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Nayatel Cloud in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
TELUS has 371.7% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Nayatel Cloud (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Nayatel Cloud cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - TELUS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TELUS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Nayatel Cloud

TELUS
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.