Comparison Overview

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers

VS

UK Ministry of Defence

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers

None
Last Update: 2025-12-18

We are NAVSEA. The Force Behind the Fleet. Join us and become part of a mission-driven team, at one of the best places to work in the federal government. This NAVSEA LinkedIn page is all about connecting with talented individuals ready to make a difference through a rewarding career with us. We share exciting job opportunities, recruitment events, highlight the NAVSEA mission, and show you how you can help support our warfighters and contribute to the Navy’s broader goals. When you join NAVSEA, you're joining a dynamic team committed to advancing naval capabilities. Whether you're an engineer, program manager, analyst, or IT professional, your work will directly impact the safety and success of our sailors, ensuring the Navy stays at the forefront of global maritime strength.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23,137
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

UK Ministry of Defence

Ministry of Defence, Whitehall, London, None, GB, SW1A 2HB
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 0 and 549

We protect the security, independence and interests of the United Kingdom at home and abroad. We work with our allies and partners whenever possible. Our aim is to ensure that the UK’s Armed Forces have the training, equipment and support necessary for their work, and that we keep within budget. Our priorities 2015 to 2020 are to: · protect our people · project our global influence · promote our prosperity · maintain a strategic base and integrated global support network, and manage the Department of State

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 29,703
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
12
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uk-ministry-of-defence.jpeg
UK Ministry of Defence
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UK Ministry of Defence
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers in 2025.

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

UK Ministry of Defence has 300.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UK Ministry of Defence (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UK Ministry of Defence cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/navseacareers.jpeg
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uk-ministry-of-defence.jpeg
UK Ministry of Defence
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Exposure, Negligence, Insecure Work Practices
Motivation: None (Unintentional)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: third-party compromise (Dodd Group), gateway attack, phishing (likely), dark web data exfiltration
Motivation: financial gain (ransom threats), espionage, geopolitical disruption, reputation damage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UK Ministry of Defence company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UK Ministry of Defence company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company.

In the current year, UK Ministry of Defence company has reported more cyber incidents than Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company.

Neither UK Ministry of Defence company nor Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

UK Ministry of Defence company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both UK Ministry of Defence company and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

Neither Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company nor UK Ministry of Defence company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers nor UK Ministry of Defence holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to UK Ministry of Defence company.

UK Ministry of Defence company employs more people globally than Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, reflecting its scale as a Defense and Space Manufacturing.

Neither Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers nor UK Ministry of Defence holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers nor UK Ministry of Defence holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers nor UK Ministry of Defence holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers nor UK Ministry of Defence holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers nor UK Ministry of Defence holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers nor UK Ministry of Defence holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Versions starting with 0.211.0 and prior to 1.120.4, 1.121.1, and 1.122.0 contain a critical Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability in their workflow expression evaluation system. Under certain conditions, expressions supplied by authenticated users during workflow configuration may be evaluated in an execution context that is not sufficiently isolated from the underlying runtime. An authenticated attacker could abuse this behavior to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the n8n process. Successful exploitation may lead to full compromise of the affected instance, including unauthorized access to sensitive data, modification of workflows, and execution of system-level operations. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.120.4, 1.121.1, and 1.122.0. Users are strongly advised to upgrade to a patched version, which introduces additional safeguards to restrict expression evaluation. If upgrading is not immediately possible, administrators should consider the following temporary mitigations: Limit workflow creation and editing permissions to fully trusted users only; and/or deploy n8n in a hardened environment with restricted operating system privileges and network access to reduce the impact of potential exploitation. These workarounds do not fully eliminate the risk and should only be used as short-term measures.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

FastAPI Users allows users to quickly add a registration and authentication system to their FastAPI project. Prior to version 15.0.2, the OAuth login state tokens are completely stateless and carry no per-request entropy or any data that could link them to the session that initiated the OAuth flow. `generate_state_token()` is always called with an empty `state_data` dict, so the resulting JWT only contains the fixed audience claim plus an expiration timestamp. On callback, the library merely checks that the JWT verifies under `state_secret` and is unexpired; there is no attempt to match the state value to the browser that initiated the OAuth request, no correlation cookie, and no server-side cache. Any attacker can hit `/authorize`, capture the server-generated state, finish the upstream OAuth flow with their own provider account, and then trick a victim into loading `.../callback?code=<attacker_code>&state=<attacker_state>`. Because the state JWT is valid for any client for \~1 hour, the victim’s browser will complete the flow. This leads to login CSRF. Depending on the app’s logic, the login CSRF can lead to an account takeover of the victim account or to the victim user getting logged in to the attacker's account. Version 15.0.2 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

FileZilla Client 3.63.1 contains a DLL hijacking vulnerability that allows attackers to execute malicious code by placing a crafted TextShaping.dll in the application directory. Attackers can generate a reverse shell payload using msfvenom and replace the missing DLL to achieve remote code execution when the application launches.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LDAP Tool Box Self Service Password 1.5.2 contains a password reset vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate HTTP Host headers during token generation. Attackers can craft malicious password reset requests that generate tokens sent to a controlled server, enabling potential account takeover by intercepting and using stolen reset tokens.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Kimai 1.30.10 contains a SameSite cookie vulnerability that allows attackers to steal user session cookies through malicious exploitation. Attackers can trick victims into executing a crafted PHP script that captures and writes session cookie information to a file, enabling potential session hijacking.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X