Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA)Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA)
VS
Babcock International GroupBabcock International Group
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA)

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA)

1333 Isaac Hull Ave SE, Washington Navy Yard, 20376, US

Last Update: 23/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.navsea.navy.mil
762/1000Fair

The Naval Sea Systems Command is comprised of command staff, headquarters directorates, affiliated Program Executive Offices (PEOs) and numerous field activities. Together, we engineer, build, buy and maintain ships, submarines and combat systems that meet the Fleet's c...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:5,662
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Babcock International Group

Babcock International Group

33 Wigmore Street, London, W1U 1QX, GB

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
772/1000Fair

Babcock is a FTSE 100 defence company operating in our focus countries of the UK, Australasia, Canada, France and South Africa, with exports to additional markets. Our Purpose, to create a safe and secure world, together, defines our strategy. We support and enhance o...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:16,141
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA)

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Babcock International Group

Babcock International Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Babcock International Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Babcock International Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Babcock International Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA)

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Babcock International Group

Babcock International Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) company and Babcock International Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) company and Babcock International Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) company and Babcock International Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) company and Babcock International Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) company and Babcock International Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) company and Babcock International Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) company and Babcock International Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) company and Babcock International Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) company and Babcock International Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) company and Babcock International Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) company and Babcock International Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) and Babcock International Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) and Babcock International Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) or Babcock International Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) or Babcock International Group ?
Between Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) and Babcock International Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) and Babcock International Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA