Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Navigate360Navigate360
VS
TÜV SÜDTÜV SÜD
Navigate360

Navigate360

3900 Kinross Lakes Pkwy , Suite 200, Richfield, Ohio, US, 44286

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://navigate360.com/
644/1000Poor

Navigate360 is the leading provider of safety solutions for schools, leading to enhanced student well-being. With more than 20 years of experience, our multifaceted, layered approach—providing everything from curricula that support positive behavior and self-image to ca...

NAICS:92219
NAICS Definition:Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees:214
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
TÜV SÜD

TÜV SÜD

Westendstr. 199, Munich, Germany, DE, 80686

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tuvsud.com
796/1000Fair

TÜV SÜD is the trusted partner of choice for safety, security and sustainability solutions. Our community of experts is passionate about technology and united by the belief that technology should better people’s lives. We work alongside our customers to anticipate and...

NAICS:92219
NAICS Definition:Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees:17,734
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Navigate360

Navigate360

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TÜV SÜD

TÜV SÜD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)

Navigate360 has 30.72% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TÜV SÜD in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Navigate360 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Navigate360 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TÜV SÜD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TÜV SÜD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Navigate360

Navigate360

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NAV1773930961
🔒 Incident : Breach
CRI1773966644
TÜV SÜD

TÜV SÜD

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Navigate360 company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Navigate360 company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Navigate360 company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Navigate360 company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Navigate360 company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Navigate360 company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Navigate360 company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Navigate360 company and TÜV SÜD company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Navigate360 company and TÜV SÜD company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Navigate360 company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Navigate360 company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Navigate360 and TÜV SÜD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Navigate360 and TÜV SÜD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Navigate360 or TÜV SÜD ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Navigate360 or TÜV SÜD ?
Between Navigate360 and TÜV SÜD, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Navigate360 and TÜV SÜD, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2