Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc.Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc.
VS
PaychexPaychex
Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc.

Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc.

707 S Grady Way, Renton, 98057, US

Last Update: 24/03/2026

View Profile
623/1000Poor

Navia is a national, Health and Wealth benefits provider serving 10,000+ clients across all 50 states. We offer comprehensive benefits administration, retirement, CDH, finance, lifestyle, and compliance solutions to employers and deliver industry-leading customer servic...

NAICS:541612
NAICS Definition:Human Resources Consulting Services
Employees:289
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Paychex

Paychex

911 Panorama Trail South, Rochester, 14625, US

Last Update: 07/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.paychex.com/
746/1000Moderate

As the future of work continues to evolve, Paychex leads the way by making complex HR, payroll, and benefits brilliantly simple. Our unique combination of digital HR technology and advisory solutions meets the changing needs of employers and their employees. You can see...

NAICS:541612
NAICS Definition:Human Resources Consulting Services
Employees:18,562
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc.

Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Paychex

Paychex

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Human Resources Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Human Resources Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Paychex in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Paychex (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Paychex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc.

Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NAVHAC1774377242
🔒 Incident : Breach
NAV1773671790
Paychex

Paychex

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PAY1792317102325
🔒 Incident : Breach
PAY406072525

FAQ

Between Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc. company and Paychex company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc. company and Paychex company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc. company and Paychex company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc. company and Paychex company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc. company and Paychex company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc. company and Paychex company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc. company and Paychex company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc. company and Paychex company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc. company and Paychex company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc. company and Paychex company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc. company and Paychex company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc. and Paychex, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc. and Paychex, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc. or Paychex ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc. or Paychex ?
Between Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc. and Paychex, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Navia Benefit Solutions, Inc. and Paychex, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2