Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NAVER CorpNAVER Corp
VS
TietoTieto
NAVER Corp

NAVER Corp

NAVER 1784, 95 Jeongjail-ro, Jeongja-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, KR, 13561

Last Update: 14/07/2026

View Profile
731/1000Moderate

네이버는 1999년 검색 포털로 시작해 20년이 넘는 시간 동안 검색, 광고, 커머스, 핀테크, 콘텐츠, 클라우드, 인공지능, 로보틱스 등 다양한 분야로 사업을 확장하며, 국내를 대표하는 글로벌 ICT 기업으로 성장했습니다. 국내 최대 규모의 IDC와 최첨단 클라우드·인프라 역량을 바탕으로, AI와 로보틱스 등 혁신 기술을 서비스에 적용함으로써 모두의 일상을 새롭게 만듭니다. 글로벌 사용자, 파트너가 함께 누리고 성장할 수 있는 생태계를 만들기 위해 독창적인 서비스와 콘텐...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:5,136
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Tieto

Tieto

N/A

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.tieto.com/
742/1000Moderate

Tieto provides customers across different industries with mission-critical solutions through its specialized software businesses Tieto Caretech, Tieto Banktech and Tieto Indtech as well as Tieto Tech Consulting business. The company's around 13 000 talented vertical sof...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:12,209
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NAVER Corp

NAVER Corp

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tieto

Tieto

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

NAVER Corp has 38.65% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tieto in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - NAVER Corp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NAVER Corp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tieto (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tieto cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NAVER Corp

NAVER Corp

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LYCNAV1784047058
Tieto

Tieto

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TIE722080425

FAQ

Between NAVER Corp company and Tieto company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NAVER Corp company and Tieto company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NAVER Corp company and Tieto company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NAVER Corp company and Tieto company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NAVER Corp company and Tieto company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NAVER Corp company and Tieto company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NAVER Corp company and Tieto company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NAVER Corp company and Tieto company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NAVER Corp company and Tieto company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NAVER Corp company and Tieto company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NAVER Corp company and Tieto company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NAVER Corp and Tieto, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NAVER Corp and Tieto, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NAVER Corp or Tieto ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NAVER Corp or Tieto ?
Between NAVER Corp and Tieto, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NAVER Corp and Tieto, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8