Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Naval Inspector GeneralNaval Inspector General
VS
British ArmyBritish Army
Naval Inspector General

Naval Inspector General

Washington, D.C., US

Last Update: 18/02/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

Official LinkedIn account of the Naval Inspector General. Our mission is to inspect, investigate or inquire into any and all matters of importance to the Department of the Navy and maintain the highest level of public confidence. Do not use this page to submit inquir...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
British Army

British Army

Trenchard Lines, Andover, Hampshire, GB

Last Update: 18/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.apply.army.mod.uk
766/1000Fair

Joining the British Army, you’ll get much more from life than you ever would with a civilian career – you’ll have the opportunity to do something that really matters, with a team that are like family to you. The sense of belonging in the Army is next level: when you’ve ...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:34,318
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Naval Inspector General

Naval Inspector General

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
British Army

British Army

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Naval Inspector General in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for British Army in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Naval Inspector General (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Naval Inspector General cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - British Army (X = Date, Y = Severity)

British Army cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Naval Inspector General

Naval Inspector General

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
British Army

British Army

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BRI185612522

FAQ

Between Naval Inspector General company and British Army company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Naval Inspector General company and British Army company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Naval Inspector General company and British Army company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Naval Inspector General company and British Army company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Naval Inspector General company and British Army company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Naval Inspector General company and British Army company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Naval Inspector General company and British Army company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Naval Inspector General company and British Army company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Naval Inspector General company and British Army company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Naval Inspector General company and British Army company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Naval Inspector General company and British Army company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Naval Inspector General and British Army, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Naval Inspector General and British Army, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Naval Inspector General or British Army ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Naval Inspector General or British Army ?
Between Naval Inspector General and British Army, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Naval Inspector General and British Army, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA