Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head DivisionNaval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division
VS
V2X IncV2X Inc
Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division

Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division

3767 Strauss Ave, Indian Head, Maryland, 20640, US

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile

Naval Surface Warfare Center, Indian Head Division is the Department of Defense Energetics Center and serves as the DoD Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technology Program lead. NSWC IHD focuses on the research, development, test, evaluation and in-service support of energ...

NAICS:336
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:319
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
V2X Inc

V2X Inc

7901 Jones Branch Dr, Suite 700, McLean, Virginia, US, 22102

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gov2x.com
755/1000Fair

V2X is a leading provider of critical mission solutions and support to defense clients globally, formed by the 2022 Merger of Vectrus and Vertex to build on more than 120 combined years of successful mission support. We deliver a comprehensive suite of integrated soluti...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:10,735
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division

Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
V2X Inc

V2X Inc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for V2X Inc in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - V2X Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

V2X Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division

Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
V2X Inc

V2X Inc

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division company and V2X Inc company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division company and V2X Inc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division company and V2X Inc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division company and V2X Inc company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division company and V2X Inc company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division company and V2X Inc company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division company and V2X Inc company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division company and V2X Inc company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division company and V2X Inc company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division company and V2X Inc company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division company and V2X Inc company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division and V2X Inc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division and V2X Inc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division or V2X Inc ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division or V2X Inc ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division and V2X Inc, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division and V2X Inc, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2