Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane DivisionNaval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division
VS
LeidosLeidos
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division

Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division

300 Highway 361, Crane, Indiana, 47522, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile

The mission of NSWC Crane is to provide acquisition engineering, in-service engineering and technical support for sensors, electronics, electronic warfare and special warfare weapons. NSWC Crane also works to apply component and system-level product and industrial engin...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:783
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Leidos

Leidos

1750 Presidents St, Reston, 20190, US

Last Update: 29/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.leidos.com
783/1000Fair

Leidos is a Fortune 500® innovation company rapidly addressing the world’s most vexing challenges in national security and health. The company's global workforce of 48,000 collaborates to create smarter technology solutions for customers in heavily regulated industries....

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:36,033
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division

Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Leidos

Leidos

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Leidos in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Leidos (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Leidos cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division

Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Leidos

Leidos

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division company and Leidos company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division company and Leidos company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division company and Leidos company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division company and Leidos company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division company and Leidos company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division company and Leidos company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division company and Leidos company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division company and Leidos company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division company and Leidos company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division company and Leidos company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division company and Leidos company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division and Leidos, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division and Leidos, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division or Leidos ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division or Leidos ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division and Leidos, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division and Leidos, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA