Comparison Overview

NAVAL GROUP

VS

L3 Technologies

NAVAL GROUP

40-42 rue du docteur FInlay, None, Paris cedex 15, None, FR, 75732
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 700 and 749

As an international naval defence player, Naval Group is a partner for countries seeking to maintain control of their maritime sovereignty. Naval Group develops innovative solutions to meet its customers’ requirements. The group is present throughout the entire life cycle of vessels. It designs, produces, equips, integrates, supports and upgrades submarines and surface ships, as well as their systems and equipment, right up to the final phases of deconstruction and dismantling. Naval Group’s unique know-how in autonomous systems, underwater weapons and drones place it in pole position to become European leader in the sector. As a high-tech company, it draws on its outstanding expertise, unique design and production resources and ability to establish strategic partnerships, in particular within the framework of transfers of technology. It also provides shipyard and naval base services. Ever mindful of the issues concerning corporate social responsibility (CSR), Naval Group is a signatory to the United Nations Global Compact. Located on five continents, the group generates revenue of 4.355 billion euros and has 16,722 employees (Full-Time Equivalent average annual workforce - figures as on 31 December 2024).

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 11,935
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

L3 Technologies

600 Third Ave, New York, NY, US, 10016
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

With headquarters in New York City and approximately 31,000 employees worldwide, L3 develops advanced defense technologies and commercial solutions in pilot training, aviation security, night vision and EO/IR, weapons, maritime systems and space. The company reported 2018 sales of $10.2 billion. To learn more about L3, please visit the company’s website.

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 15,458
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/l3.jpeg
L3 Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NAVAL GROUP
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
L3 Technologies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

NAVAL GROUP has 36.99% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L3 Technologies in 2025.

Incident History — NAVAL GROUP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NAVAL GROUP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — L3 Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L3 Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/naval-group.jpeg
NAVAL GROUP
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/l3.jpeg
L3 Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

L3 Technologies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NAVAL GROUP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

NAVAL GROUP company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas L3 Technologies company has not reported any.

In the current year, NAVAL GROUP company has reported more cyber incidents than L3 Technologies company.

Neither L3 Technologies company nor NAVAL GROUP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

NAVAL GROUP company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other L3 Technologies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

NAVAL GROUP company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while L3 Technologies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither NAVAL GROUP company nor L3 Technologies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NAVAL GROUP nor L3 Technologies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

L3 Technologies company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to NAVAL GROUP company.

L3 Technologies company employs more people globally than NAVAL GROUP company, reflecting its scale as a Defense and Space Manufacturing.

Neither NAVAL GROUP nor L3 Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NAVAL GROUP nor L3 Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NAVAL GROUP nor L3 Technologies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NAVAL GROUP nor L3 Technologies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NAVAL GROUP nor L3 Technologies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NAVAL GROUP nor L3 Technologies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N