Comparison Overview

NatWest Group

VS

U.S. Bank

NatWest Group

175 Glasgow Road, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH12 9BH, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-20

Our ambition is simple: to succeed with our customers. Because when they succeed, so do we. Whether it’s buying a home, investing for tomorrow, growing a business, or helping our customers to build a more sustainable future, we can succeed with customers by understanding their world and what matters to them: their priorities, aspirations, and the challenges they face. We want to help them to navigate change and make progress towards their goals with the right services and expertise. At the same time, we are becoming a simpler, more integrated and technology-driven NatWest Group: able to anticipate, understand and respond to customers’ changing needs and expectations faster and more effectively, and with greater impact. With a range of businesses across the organisation, an inclusive culture and flexible working opportunities, there’s nothing to stop you realising your potential with us at NatWest Group.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 41,331
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

U.S. Bank

800 Nicollet Mall, None, Minneapolis, MN, US, 55402
Last Update: 2025-11-27

At U.S. Bank, we help millions of clients achieve their goals with a balance of best-in-class technology and human expertise tailored to individual needs. As the fifth-largest commercial bank in the United States, we’ve built a reputation for strength and stability across a diversified mix of businesses, including commercial and institutional banking, business banking, payments, wealth management and consumer banking. We’ve been named one of the World’s Most Ethical Companies® by the Ethisphere Institute and the most admired superregional bank by Fortune. In addition to thousands of branches serving consumers, U.S. Bank offers a complete suite of products, services and strategic partnerships for business. Within our Wealth, Corporate, Commercial and Institutional Banking division, we serve more than half a million clients across the country and around the world, ranging from wealthy individuals and families to the largest corporations, including 90% of Fortune 1000 companies. We’re also consistently recognized as a great place to work. We’re shaping our company culture with intention, focused on creating a workplace where it’s safe to speak up, share ideas and try new things. We’re proud to be recognized as a “Best for Vets” employer by the Military Times and included on Fair360’s (formerly DiversityInc.) list of Top 50 Companies for Diversity. U.S. Bank, NA. Member FDIC. Equal Housing Lender.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 79,818
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/natwest-group.jpeg
NatWest Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-bank.jpeg
U.S. Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NatWest Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
U.S. Bank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NatWest Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S. Bank in 2025.

Incident History — NatWest Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NatWest Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — U.S. Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/natwest-group.jpeg
NatWest Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-bank.jpeg
U.S. Bank
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent sharing of a file by a vendor
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

NatWest Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to U.S. Bank company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

U.S. Bank company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas NatWest Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, U.S. Bank company and NatWest Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither U.S. Bank company nor NatWest Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

U.S. Bank company has disclosed at least one data breach, while NatWest Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

U.S. Bank company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while NatWest Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither NatWest Group company nor U.S. Bank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NatWest Group nor U.S. Bank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NatWest Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to U.S. Bank company.

U.S. Bank company employs more people globally than NatWest Group company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither NatWest Group nor U.S. Bank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NatWest Group nor U.S. Bank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NatWest Group nor U.S. Bank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NatWest Group nor U.S. Bank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NatWest Group nor U.S. Bank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NatWest Group nor U.S. Bank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H