Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM)Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM)
VS
Kuehne+NagelKuehne+Nagel
Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM)

Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM)

429 11th Ave, New York City, New York, 10001, US

Last Update: 13/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ndemevent.com/
751/1000Fair

The Natural Disaster & Emergency Management (NDEM) Expo is a comprehensive trade event and online resource dedicated to the preparation, response, and recovery of physical and human assets of public and private organizations. NDEM will help your organization gain the kn...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:91
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Kuehne+Nagel

Kuehne+Nagel

Kuehne + Nagel, Schindellegi, 8834, CH

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kuehne-nagel.com
798/1000Fair

With more than 82,000 employees at almost 1,300 sites in close to 100 countries, the Kuehne+Nagel Group is one of the world's leading logistics providers. Headquartered in Switzerland, Kuehne+Nagel is listed in the Swiss blue-chip stock market index, the SMI. The Grou...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:50,462
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM)

Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Kuehne+Nagel

Kuehne+Nagel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kuehne+Nagel in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Kuehne+Nagel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kuehne+Nagel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM)

Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Kuehne+Nagel

Kuehne+Nagel

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) company and Kuehne+Nagel company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) company and Kuehne+Nagel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) company and Kuehne+Nagel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) company and Kuehne+Nagel company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) company and Kuehne+Nagel company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) company and Kuehne+Nagel company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) company and Kuehne+Nagel company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) company and Kuehne+Nagel company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) company and Kuehne+Nagel company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) company and Kuehne+Nagel company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) company and Kuehne+Nagel company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) and Kuehne+Nagel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) and Kuehne+Nagel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) or Kuehne+Nagel ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) or Kuehne+Nagel ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) and Kuehne+Nagel, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) and Kuehne+Nagel, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1