Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM)Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM)
VS
DB SchenkerDB Schenker
Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM)

Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM)

429 11th Ave, New York City, New York, 10001, US

Last Update: 13/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ndemevent.com/
751/1000Fair

The Natural Disaster & Emergency Management (NDEM) Expo is a comprehensive trade event and online resource dedicated to the preparation, response, and recovery of physical and human assets of public and private organizations. NDEM will help your organization gain the kn...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:91
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
DB Schenker

DB Schenker

OO

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.dbschenker.com
803/1000Good

At DB Schenker, we're not just about logistics; we're about understanding what truly matters to you. As a global leader in transportation and logistics, we're dedicated to supporting industries and businesses worldwide in the seamless exchange of goods. Our integrated a...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:44,435
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM)

Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DB Schenker

DB Schenker

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DB Schenker in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DB Schenker (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DB Schenker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM)

Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
DB Schenker

DB Schenker

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) company and DB Schenker company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) company and DB Schenker company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) company and DB Schenker company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) company and DB Schenker company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) company and DB Schenker company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) company and DB Schenker company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) company and DB Schenker company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) company and DB Schenker company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) company and DB Schenker company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) company and DB Schenker company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) company and DB Schenker company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) and DB Schenker, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) and DB Schenker, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) or DB Schenker ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) or DB Schenker ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) and DB Schenker, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Natural Disaster & Emergency Management Expo (NDEM) and DB Schenker, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2