Comparison Overview

Natura

VS

O Boticário

Natura

Av. Alexandre Colares, 1.188, Vila Jaguara S√£o Paulo, S√£o Paulo 05106-0000, BR
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.natura.com.br

Founded in 1969, Natura is a Brazilian multinational in the cosmetics and personal care segment, a leader in direct sales in Brazil, and recognized for protecting the Amazon social biodiversity through its sustainable business model. Cruelty free. 100% vegan. With 7,000 employees and 2 million beauty Consultants worldwide, Natura operates in 11 countries. In 2014, Natura became the first publicly traded company to receive B Corp ™ certification, and its third certification was concluded in 2020. Natura’s Ekos line is certified by the Union for Ethical Biotrade (UEBT). Learn more: natura.com

NAICS: 325
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

O Boticário

Av. Rui Barbosa, 4.110, Parque das Fontes,, São José dos Pinhais, PR, 83.050-010, BR
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.oboticario.com.br

A beleza transforma, encanta, conquista e também pode ser conquistada. Eis o ideal de beleza que O Boticário multiplica com seus produtos, lojas e em sua relação com o público. Desde 1977, O Boticário soma inspiração, ousadia, inovação e qualidade, despertando o respeito do mercado, a confiança dos parceiros e a admiração dos consumidores. Conheça mais sobre O Boticário: Instagram: http://instagram.com/oboticario Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/oboticario Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/boticario Twitter: http://twitter.com/oboticario Loja Online: www.boticario.com.br

NAICS: 32562
NAICS Definition: Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees: 19,719
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/natura.jpeg
Natura
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/o-boticario.jpeg
O Boticário
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Natura
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
O Boticário
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Natura in 2025.

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for O Boticário in 2025.

Incident History — Natura (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Natura cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — O Boticário (X = Date, Y = Severity)

O Boticário cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/natura.jpeg
Natura
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/o-boticario.jpeg
O Boticário
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Natura company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to O Boticário company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, O Boticário company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Natura company.

In the current year, O Boticário company and Natura company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither O Boticário company nor Natura company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither O Boticário company nor Natura company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither O Boticário company nor Natura company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Natura company nor O Boticário company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Natura nor O Boticário holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

O Boticário company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Natura company.

O Boticário company employs more people globally than Natura company, reflecting its scale as a Personal Care Product Manufacturing.

Neither Natura nor O Boticário holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Natura nor O Boticário holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Natura nor O Boticário holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Natura nor O Boticário holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Natura nor O Boticário holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Natura nor O Boticário holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References