NCCDCE A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
NCCDCE
Company Information
Website:https://ccdcoe.org/
Employees number:79
Number of followers:30,510
NAICS:336414
Industry Type:Defense and Space Manufacturing
Homepage:ccdcoe.org
NCCDCE Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
NCCDCEDefense and Space Manufacturing
Updated:
21/03/2026
21/03/2026
743/1000
Moderate
Ba
NCCDCE Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
NCCDCEDefense and Space Manufacturing
Score locked

NCCDCEModerate
Current Score
743Ba (MODERATE)
01000
1 incidents
0 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
743
MAY 2026
743
APRIL 2026
743
MARCH 2026
743
FEBRUARY 2026
743
JANUARY 2026
743
DECEMBER 2025
743
NOVEMBER 2025
743
OCTOBER 2025
743
SEPTEMBER 2025
742
AUGUST 2025
751
JULY 2025
751
SEPTEMBER 2020
746
Cyber Attack
01 Sep 2020 • NCCDCE
NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization)
Spoofing of NATO Naval Vessels' AIS Locations by Russia (2020)
733
CRITICAL-13
NAT906092125
In September 2020, a sophisticated cyber spoofing attack targeted the Automatic Identification System (AIS) of multiple NATO naval vessels, including the HMS Queen Elizabeth (UK), HMS Duncan (UK), HMS Albion (UK), HNLMS Rotterdam (Netherlands), HNLMS Johan de Witt (Netherlands), and BNS Leopold (Belgium). The threat actor, attributed to Russia, falsified the AIS transmissions to misrepresent the vessels' locations, placing them near Russian-controlled waters—a deliberate act of geopolitical provocation. The spoofed positions were ghost readings, designed to create a false narrative of NATO encroachment, framing Russia as a victim of international aggression.This attack did not result in physical damage, data breaches, or financial losses, but it undermined trust in maritime navigation systems, risked miscalculation in military operations, and escalated tensions between NATO and Russia. The incident was part of a broader pattern, with nearly 100 similar spoofing events targeting NATO assets. While no immediate operational impact occurred, the long-term implications include eroded confidence in AIS integrity, potential disruption of naval coordination, and heightened risks of accidental conflicts due to manipulated situational awareness.The attack demonstrated how cyber-enabled disinformation can be weaponized in hybrid warfare, blending technical deception with psychological operations to achieve strategic objectives without kinetic confrontation.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
REFERENCES
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for NCCDCE ??
What was NCCDCE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was NCCDCE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was NCCDCE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was NCCDCE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was NCCDCE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was NCCDCE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was NCCDCE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What was NCCDCE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ??
What was NCCDCE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ??
What was NCCDCE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ??
What was NCCDCE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on NCCDCE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with NCCDCE ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view NCCDCE's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?