Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NATONATO
VS
World Health OrganizationWorld Health Organization
NATO

NATO

Bd. Leopold III, Brussels, 1110, BE

Last Update: 12/06/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.nato.int
827/1000Good

Working for peace, security and freedom for one billion people. Official LinkedIn account of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. #NATO #WeAreNATO Comments posted by followers do not necessarily represent official opinion or policy of member governments, or of NA...

NAICS:92812
NAICS Definition:International Affairs
Employees:9,204
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3
World Health Organization

World Health Organization

20, avenue Appia, Geneva 27, 1211, CH

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.who.int
808/1000Good

The World Health Organization's mission: to promote health, keep the world safe, and serve the vulnerable. Working through offices in more than 150 countries, WHO staff work side by side with governments and other partners to ensure the highest attainable level of healt...

NAICS:92812
NAICS Definition:International Affairs
Employees:30,956
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NATO

NATO

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
World Health Organization

World Health Organization

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Avg (This Year)

NATO has 53.27% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for World Health Organization in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - NATO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NATO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - World Health Organization (X = Date, Y = Severity)

World Health Organization cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NATO

NATO

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NAT1773851315
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
NATMIC1781267313
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NAT1492114091725
World Health Organization

World Health Organization

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
WOR201411222
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
WOR903061925

FAQ

Between NATO company and World Health Organization company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NATO company and World Health Organization company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NATO company and World Health Organization company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NATO company and World Health Organization company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NATO company and World Health Organization company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NATO company and World Health Organization company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NATO company and World Health Organization company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NATO company and World Health Organization company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NATO company and World Health Organization company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NATO company and World Health Organization company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NATO company and World Health Organization company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NATO and World Health Organization, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NATO and World Health Organization, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NATO or World Health Organization ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NATO or World Health Organization ?
Between NATO and World Health Organization, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NATO and World Health Organization, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2