Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF)NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF)
VS
United States Department of WarUnited States Department of War
NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF)

NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF)

1486 Blandy Rd, Norfolk, 23551, US

Last Update: 09/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://jfcnorfolk.nato.int/
749/1000Moderate

Joint Force Command Norfolk, one of NATO’s three operational commands, is operationally ready to execute NATO’s three core tasks of deterrence and defence; crisis prevention and management; and cooperative security. JFC Norfolk relies on a coordinated command network, ...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:37
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
United States Department of War

United States Department of War

Washington, DC, US

Last Update: 27/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://war.gov
812/1000Good

The mission of the Department of War is to provide military forces necessary to protect the security of our country. The U.S. military defends the homeland, deters adversaries, and builds security around the world by projecting U.S. influence and working with allies and...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:69,227
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF)

NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
United States Department of War

United States Department of War

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United States Department of War in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - United States Department of War (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United States Department of War cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF)

NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
United States Department of War

United States Department of War

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF) company and United States Department of War company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF) company and United States Department of War company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF) company and United States Department of War company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF) company and United States Department of War company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF) company and United States Department of War company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF) company and United States Department of War company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF) company and United States Department of War company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF) company and United States Department of War company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF) company and United States Department of War company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF) company and United States Department of War company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF) company and United States Department of War company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF) and United States Department of War, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF) and United States Department of War, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF) or United States Department of War ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF) or United States Department of War ?
Between NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF) and United States Department of War, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFCNF) and United States Department of War, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-102335
SUMMARY

Nginx Proxy Manager through 2.16.0 fails to restrict the advanced_config field to administrators, allowing non-admin users with manage permissions to inject arbitrary nginx directives. Attackers can inject malicious nginx configuration such as alias directives to serve arbitrary files or control routing for their assigned hosts.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-28
UPDATED
Date2026-09-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-102334
SUMMARY

Nginx Proxy Manager through 2.16.0 lacks rate-limiting on authentication endpoints, allowing unauthenticated attackers to make unlimited password guesses against any account. Attackers can brute-force login credentials via POST /api/tokens and subsequently guess TOTP codes via POST /api/tokens/2fa to gain full session access and administrative control.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-28
UPDATED
Date2026-09-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-102333
SUMMARY

httpdbg before 2.2.1 fails to validate URL schemes in recorded HTTP request URLs rendered as clickable links in the web interface. Attackers controlling traffic recorded by httpdbg can supply javascript: scheme URLs that execute malicious scripts in the application origin when clicked, allowing access to captured request and response data including headers and tokens.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-28
UPDATED
Date2026-09-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-102332
SUMMARY

Dozzle versions before 11.1.2 fail to sanitize container display names when building ZIP archive entry names in the log download endpoint. Attackers who can label containers can use path traversal sequences to write files outside the extraction directory when users download and extract logs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-28
UPDATED
Date2026-09-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-101262
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in Ziroom ZHOME A0101 1.0.1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /api/ZRQos/set_online_client. The manipulation of the argument ip leads to command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-28
UPDATED
Date2026-09-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3