Comparison Overview

National Protective Security Authority (NPSA)

VS

I work for NSW

National Protective Security Authority (NPSA)

None
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 700 and 749

The National Protective Security Authority (NPSA) is part of MI5 and is the National Technical Authority for physical and personnel protective security. By making the UK more resilient to national security threats, we help to make the UK safe. We help organisations understand the range of threats they and the UK face, for example from terrorism, espionage, and state actors. Based on our world-leading research and development programme and the latest intelligence, we provide advice and guidance on what organisations can do to minimise their risk through how they operate day to day. In March 2023, NPSA absorbed the responsibilities of the Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure (CPNI), but with a broader remit, reflecting the fact that the threats the UK faces today extend far beyond critical national infrastructure. To find out more, visit NPSA.gov.uk Please note, we do not routinely respond to comments and messages on LinkedIn. If you need to contact us, please visit the website. Disclaimer: No legitimate member of NPSA would be listed as an employee on social media, so please disregard any associations shown.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

I work for NSW

undefined, Sydney, NSW, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

The NSW public sector includes ten departments and many agencies and organisations working together to develop policy and deliver important services such as health, education, housing, transport and infrastructure across NSW. We are over 300,000 dedicated people who share the same values - making a difference, giving back and responding to the future. Read our community guidelines: bit.ly/PD-community-guidelines

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 59,726
Subsidiaries: 17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-protective-security-authority.jpeg
National Protective Security Authority (NPSA)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nsw-government.jpeg
I work for NSW
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Protective Security Authority (NPSA)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
I work for NSW
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

National Protective Security Authority (NPSA) has 23.46% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for I work for NSW in 2025.

Incident History — National Protective Security Authority (NPSA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Protective Security Authority (NPSA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — I work for NSW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

I work for NSW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-protective-security-authority.jpeg
National Protective Security Authority (NPSA)
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: WhatsApp, Signal
Motivation: Espionage, Data Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nsw-government.jpeg
I work for NSW
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Accidental Exposure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 07/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial gain, data exfiltration
Blog: Blog

FAQ

I work for NSW company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Protective Security Authority (NPSA) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

I work for NSW company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to National Protective Security Authority (NPSA) company.

In the current year, National Protective Security Authority (NPSA) company has reported more cyber incidents than I work for NSW company.

I work for NSW company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while National Protective Security Authority (NPSA) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

I work for NSW company has disclosed at least one data breach, while National Protective Security Authority (NPSA) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both I work for NSW company and National Protective Security Authority (NPSA) company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

Neither National Protective Security Authority (NPSA) company nor I work for NSW company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Protective Security Authority (NPSA) nor I work for NSW holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

I work for NSW company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to National Protective Security Authority (NPSA) company.

I work for NSW company employs more people globally than National Protective Security Authority (NPSA) company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither National Protective Security Authority (NPSA) nor I work for NSW holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Protective Security Authority (NPSA) nor I work for NSW holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Protective Security Authority (NPSA) nor I work for NSW holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Protective Security Authority (NPSA) nor I work for NSW holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Protective Security Authority (NPSA) nor I work for NSW holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Protective Security Authority (NPSA) nor I work for NSW holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, there is no handler for JSON parsing errors; SyntaxError from express.json() includes user input in the error message, which gets reflected in responses. User input (including HTML/JavaScript) can be exposed in error responses, creating an XSS risk if Content-Type isn't strictly enforced. This issue does not have a fix at the time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, when creating prompts, JSON requests are sent to define and modify the prompts via PATCH endpoint for prompt groups (/api/prompts/groups/:groupId). However, the request bodies are not sufficiently validated for proper input, enabling users to modify prompts in a way that was not intended as part of the front end system. The patchPromptGroup function passes req.body directly to updatePromptGroup() without filtering sensitive fields. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, when a user posts a question, the iconURL parameter of the POST request can be modified by an attacker. The malicious code is then stored in the chat which can then be shared to other users. When sharing chats with a potentially malicious “tracker”, resources loaded can lead to loss of privacy for users who view the chat link that is sent to them. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. Versions 2.3.1 and below have improper file permissions which allow attackers to overwrite the built-in dynamic linker and other critical files, potentially resulting in privilege escalation. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. In versions 2.3.1 and below, the tool module allows an attacker to escape the sandbox environment and escalate privileges under certain concurrent conditions. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H