Comparison Overview
NCC

NCC
1250 S Capital of Texas Hwy, West Lake Hills, 78746, US
Last Update: 03/04/2026
NCC has been improving the profitability of our clients for almost three decades. We enable our clients to increase sales, lower costs, and automate compliance through the most comprehensive suite of consumer intelligence in the market today. Our innovation, combined ...

Experian
475 Anton Blvd, Costa Mesa, CA, US, 92626
Last Update: 16/06/2026
Experian is a global data and technology company, powering opportunities for people and businesses around the world. We help to redefine lending practices, uncover and prevent fraud, simplify healthcare, deliver digital marketing solutions, and gain deeper insights into...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

NCC







Experian






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Information Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for NCC in 2026.
Incidents vs Information Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Experian has 90.48% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - NCC (X = Date, Y = Severity)
NCC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Experian (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Experian cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

NCC

Experian
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.