Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

National Cement Company P.S.C., DubaiNational Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai
VS
Masco CorporationMasco Corporation
National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai

National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai

Latifa Bint Hamdan Street, Dubai, Dubai, undefined, AE

Last Update: 20/01/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.nationalcement.ae
746/1000Moderate

National Cement Company, Dubai has been founded in 1968 under the patronage of late His Highness Sheikh Rashid Bin Sayed Al Maktoum, the Former Ruler of Dubai. It had been the first serious stride towards setting up heavy industry in the Emirates of Dubai. Today the pla...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:248
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Masco Corporation

Masco Corporation

17450 College Parkway, Livonia, 48152, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.masco.com
779/1000Fair

Masco Corporation is a global leader in the design, manufacture and distribution of branded home improvement and building products. Our products enhance the way consumers all over the world experience and enjoy their living spaces. Our portfolio of industry-leading bran...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:10,189
Subsidiaries:29
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai

National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Masco Corporation

Masco Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Masco Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Masco Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Masco Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai

National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Masco Corporation

Masco Corporation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai company and Masco Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai company and Masco Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai company and Masco Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai company and Masco Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai company and Masco Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai company and Masco Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai company and Masco Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai company and Masco Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai company and Masco Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai company and Masco Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai company and Masco Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai and Masco Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai and Masco Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai or Masco Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai or Masco Corporation ?
Between National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai and Masco Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between National Cement Company P.S.C., Dubai and Masco Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1