Comparison Overview
NATEEVO

NATEEVO
Avenida de Europa 1, Alcobendas, 28108, ES
Last Update: 21/03/2026
NATEEVO develops and cultivates digital solutions grow to boost our clients' value. As part of VASS, a leading global company in digital transformation services, we lead organizations in their transition towards the future, thanks to our Digital Fullness approach, ta...

DKSH
Wiesenstrasse 8,, P.O. Box 888, Zurich, Zurich, CH, 8034
Last Update: 05/04/2026
About DKSH DKSH’s purpose is to enrich people’s lives. For 160 years, we have been marketing, selling, and distributing high-quality products and brands for multinational and Fortune 500 companies. Through our Business Units Consumer Goods, Healthcare, Performance Mater...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

NATEEVO







DKSH






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for NATEEVO in 2026.
Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for DKSH in 2026.
Incident History - NATEEVO (X = Date, Y = Severity)
NATEEVO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - DKSH (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DKSH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

NATEEVO

DKSH
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.