Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc.Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc.
VS
Grupo BimboGrupo Bimbo
Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc.

Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc.

530 West John Street, Hicksville, 11801, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.nassaucandy.com
722/1000Moderate

Nassau Candy is one of North America's largest and most respected wholesale candy distributors, fine food suppliers, and private label manufacturers. With a legacy dating back to 1920, we have grown into a full-service B2B supplier offering an expansive selection of bul...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:678
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Grupo Bimbo

Grupo Bimbo

MX

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://grupobimbo.com
797/1000Fair

Grupo Bimbo es la empresa líder en panificación y un jugador relevante en snacks. Hornea +9,000 productos, distribuyéndolos a través de +3.5 millones de puntos de venta con +54,000 rutas. Grupo Bimbo tiene +153,000 colaboradores, +1,500 centros de ventas estratégicame...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:45,806
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc.

Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grupo Bimbo

Grupo Bimbo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Bimbo in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grupo Bimbo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Bimbo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc.

Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NAS1771008146
Grupo Bimbo

Grupo Bimbo

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. and Grupo Bimbo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. and Grupo Bimbo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. or Grupo Bimbo ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. or Grupo Bimbo ?
Between Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. and Grupo Bimbo, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. and Grupo Bimbo, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8