Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Naspers LimitedNaspers Limited
VS
IIFL (India Infoline Group)IIFL (India Infoline Group)
Naspers Limited

Naspers Limited

40 Heerengracht, Cape Town, 8001, ZA

Last Update: 05/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.naspers.com
808/1000Good

Established in 1915, Naspers has transformed itself into a global consumer internet company and one of the largest technology investors in the world. Through Prosus, the group operates and invests globally in markets with long-term growth potential, building leading con...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:2,857
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
IIFL (India Infoline Group)

IIFL (India Infoline Group)

B Wing, Trade Centre, Kamala Mills Compound, Lower Parel, Off Senapati Bapat Marg,, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400013

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
783/1000Fair

IIFL group is one of India's largest diversified financial services conglomerates with three listed entities - IIFL Finance, IIFL Securities and 360 ONE Wealth & Asset Management. Founded in 1995 by Nirmal Jain as a small research house, today IIFL Group employs over 40...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:14,736
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Naspers Limited

Naspers Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
IIFL (India Infoline Group)

IIFL (India Infoline Group)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Naspers Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IIFL (India Infoline Group) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Naspers Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Naspers Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - IIFL (India Infoline Group) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IIFL (India Infoline Group) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Naspers Limited

Naspers Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
IIFL (India Infoline Group)

IIFL (India Infoline Group)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Naspers Limited company and IIFL (India Infoline Group) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Naspers Limited company and IIFL (India Infoline Group) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Naspers Limited company and IIFL (India Infoline Group) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Naspers Limited company and IIFL (India Infoline Group) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Naspers Limited company and IIFL (India Infoline Group) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Naspers Limited company and IIFL (India Infoline Group) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Naspers Limited company and IIFL (India Infoline Group) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Naspers Limited company and IIFL (India Infoline Group) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Naspers Limited company and IIFL (India Infoline Group) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Naspers Limited company and IIFL (India Infoline Group) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Naspers Limited company and IIFL (India Infoline Group) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Naspers Limited and IIFL (India Infoline Group), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Naspers Limited and IIFL (India Infoline Group), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Naspers Limited or IIFL (India Infoline Group) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Naspers Limited or IIFL (India Infoline Group) ?
Between Naspers Limited and IIFL (India Infoline Group), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Naspers Limited and IIFL (India Infoline Group), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9