Comparison Overview

Naspers Limited

VS

Capital One

Naspers Limited

40 Heerengracht, Cape Town, undefined, 8001, ZA
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

Established in 1915, Naspers has transformed itself into a global consumer internet company and one of the largest technology investors in the world. Through Prosus, the group operates and invests globally in markets with long-term growth potential, building leading consumer internet companies that empower people and enrich communities. Prosus has its primary listing on Euronext Amsterdam and a secondary listing on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, and Naspers is the majority owner of Prosus. In South Africa, Naspers is one of the foremost investors in the technology sector and is committed to building its internet and ecommerce companies. These include Takealot, Mr D Food, Superbalist, Autotrader, Property24 and PayU, and Media24, South Africa’s leading print and digital media business. Naspers has a primary listing on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (NPN.SJ), a secondary listing on the A2X Exchange (NPN.AJ) in South Africa, and has a level 1 American Depository Receipt (ADR) programme which trades on an over-the-counter basis in the United States of America. For more information, please visit www.naspers.com.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 2,874
Subsidiaries: 17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Capital One

1680 Capital One Drive, McLean, Va, US, 22102
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 600 and 649

At Capital One, we're making things better for our customers and associates through innovation and collaboration. We were founded on the belief that everyone deserves financial freedom—and are dedicated to a world where all have equal opportunity to prosper. Banking is in our DNA, but we are so much more than a bank. We always think about what’s next—and how we can bring our customers the tools needed to improve their financial lives. Your ideas, experiences and skills will help make banking better. You’ll be part of a supportive culture while earning amazing benefits. That’s life at Capital One. Capital One is an equal opportunity employer (EOE, including disability/vet) committed to non-discrimination in compliance with applicable federal, state, and local laws. View our Social Media Community Guidelines https://www.capitalone.com/digital/social-media/

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 81,373
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
11
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nasperslimited.jpeg
Naspers Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capital-one.jpeg
Capital One
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Naspers Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Capital One
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Naspers Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

Capital One has 28.21% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Naspers Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Naspers Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Capital One (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capital One cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nasperslimited.jpeg
Naspers Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capital-one.jpeg
Capital One
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Misconfigured Firewall
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Wrongdoing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Naspers Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Capital One company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Capital One company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Naspers Limited company has not reported any.

In the current year, Capital One company has reported more cyber incidents than Naspers Limited company.

Neither Capital One company nor Naspers Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Capital One company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Naspers Limited company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Capital One company nor Naspers Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Naspers Limited company nor Capital One company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Naspers Limited nor Capital One holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Naspers Limited company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Capital One company.

Capital One company employs more people globally than Naspers Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Naspers Limited nor Capital One holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Naspers Limited nor Capital One holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Naspers Limited nor Capital One holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Naspers Limited nor Capital One holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Naspers Limited nor Capital One holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Naspers Limited nor Capital One holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H