Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NashNash
VS
CNHCNH
Nash

Nash

N/A

Last Update: 09/02/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.nashpumps.com
747/1000Moderate

Nash is a leading provider of vacuum solutions, serving the chemical, petroleum, power, paper, mining, environmental, food, and wastewater treatment industries. For more than a century, we have been trusted by customers for delivering quality, reliability, value, and pe...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:473
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
CNH

CNH

N/A

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.CNH.com
779/1000Fair

CNH ( NYSE: CNH ) is a world-class equipment, technology and services company. The Company operates commercially through its brand portfolio which includes Case IH, New Holland Agriculture, New Holland Construction, and CASE Construction Equipment. CNH has over 35,000...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:28,971
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Nash

Nash

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CNH

CNH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nash in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CNH in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Nash (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nash cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CNH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CNH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Nash

Nash

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
CNH

CNH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Nash company and CNH company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Nash company and CNH company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Nash company and CNH company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Nash company and CNH company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Nash company and CNH company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Nash company and CNH company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Nash company and CNH company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Nash company and CNH company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Nash company and CNH company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Nash company and CNH company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Nash company and CNH company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Nash and CNH, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Nash and CNH, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Nash or CNH ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Nash or CNH ?
Between Nash and CNH, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Nash and CNH, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1