Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Nashotah HouseNashotah House
VS
University of California, DavisUniversity of California, Davis
Nashotah House

Nashotah House

2777 Mission Rd, Nashotah, WI, US, 53058-9793

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.nashotah.edu
734/1000Moderate

As a leading theological seminary, Nashotah House has a proven record of forming Christian leaders to serve the church and spread the Gospel since 1842. Our breathtaking campus is located in Nashotah, Wisconsin, situated between the metros of Milwaukee and Madison. Thr...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:51
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
University of California, Davis

University of California, Davis

1 Shields Ave, Davis, California, US, 95616

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://ucdavis.edu
806/1000Good

UC Davis was founded in 1908 to serve the state of California. We do and we always will. Today, that seed planted years ago has grown into one of the world’s top universities. UC Davis has a community of faculty and staff who are leading the way in teaching, research, ...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:21,175
Subsidiaries:50
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Nashotah House

Nashotah House

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of California, Davis

University of California, Davis

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nashotah House in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

University of California, Davis has 96.08% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Nashotah House (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nashotah House cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of California, Davis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of California, Davis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Nashotah House

Nashotah House

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
NAS2827223
University of California, Davis

University of California, Davis

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
KERTHECAL1778192774
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
UC-1778200668

FAQ

Between Nashotah House company and University of California, Davis company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Nashotah House company and University of California, Davis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Nashotah House company and University of California, Davis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Nashotah House company and University of California, Davis company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Nashotah House company and University of California, Davis company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Nashotah House company and University of California, Davis company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Nashotah House company and University of California, Davis company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Nashotah House company and University of California, Davis company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Nashotah House company and University of California, Davis company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Nashotah House company and University of California, Davis company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Nashotah House company and University of California, Davis company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Nashotah House and University of California, Davis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Nashotah House and University of California, Davis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Nashotah House or University of California, Davis ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Nashotah House or University of California, Davis ?
Between Nashotah House and University of California, Davis, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Nashotah House and University of California, Davis, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3