Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

National Anti-Scam CentreNational Anti-Scam Centre
VS
US Government Accountability OfficeUS Government Accountability Office
National Anti-Scam Centre

National Anti-Scam Centre

Canberra, AU

Last Update: 29/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.nasc.gov.au
729/1000Moderate

The National Anti-Scam Centre brings together experts from government, law enforcement and the private sector to disrupt scams before they reach business and consumers. We analyse and act on trends in shared scam data through coordinated anti-scam activities. Through ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:3
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
US Government Accountability Office

US Government Accountability Office

441 G Street, N.W., Washington, 20548, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.gao.gov
682/1000Weak

For more information about GAO, please visit www.gao.gov. General Information The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) is an independent, nonpartisan agency that works for Congress. Often called the "congressional watchdog,"​ GAO investigates how the federal go...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:17,430
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
National Anti-Scam Centre

National Anti-Scam Centre

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
US Government Accountability Office

US Government Accountability Office

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

National Anti-Scam Centre has 29.58% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

US Government Accountability Office has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - National Anti-Scam Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Anti-Scam Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - US Government Accountability Office (X = Date, Y = Severity)

US Government Accountability Office cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
National Anti-Scam Centre

National Anti-Scam Centre

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NAS1777466815
US Government Accountability Office

US Government Accountability Office

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
US-1773483893
🔒 Incident : Breach
US-FOR1772821514

FAQ

Between National Anti-Scam Centre company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between National Anti-Scam Centre company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between National Anti-Scam Centre company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between National Anti-Scam Centre company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between National Anti-Scam Centre company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between National Anti-Scam Centre company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between National Anti-Scam Centre company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between National Anti-Scam Centre company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between National Anti-Scam Centre company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between National Anti-Scam Centre company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between National Anti-Scam Centre company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between National Anti-Scam Centre and US Government Accountability Office, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between National Anti-Scam Centre and US Government Accountability Office, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - National Anti-Scam Centre or US Government Accountability Office ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - National Anti-Scam Centre or US Government Accountability Office ?
Between National Anti-Scam Centre and US Government Accountability Office, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between National Anti-Scam Centre and US Government Accountability Office, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8