Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NASA Langley Research CenterNASA Langley Research Center
VS
TextronTextron
NASA Langley Research Center

NASA Langley Research Center

1 Nasa Dr, Hampton, 23666, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nasa.gov/langley
755/1000Fair

Along the shore of the Chesapeake Bay is the United States'​ first civilian aeronautics research laboratory. The National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics established the Langley Memorial Aeronautical Laboratory in Hampton, Virginia, in 1917. At the dawn of the Space ...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:1,812
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Textron

Textron

40 Westminster, Providence, 02903, US

Last Update: 20/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.textron.com
783/1000Fair

Textron Inc. is a multi-industry company that leverages its global network of aircraft, defense, industrial and finance businesses to provide customers with innovative solutions and services. Textron is known around the world for its powerful brands such as Bell, Cessna...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:26,869
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NASA Langley Research Center

NASA Langley Research Center

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Textron

Textron

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NASA Langley Research Center in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Textron in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - NASA Langley Research Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NASA Langley Research Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Textron (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Textron cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NASA Langley Research Center

NASA Langley Research Center

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Textron

Textron

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between NASA Langley Research Center company and Textron company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NASA Langley Research Center company and Textron company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NASA Langley Research Center company and Textron company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NASA Langley Research Center company and Textron company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NASA Langley Research Center company and Textron company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NASA Langley Research Center company and Textron company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NASA Langley Research Center company and Textron company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NASA Langley Research Center company and Textron company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NASA Langley Research Center company and Textron company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NASA Langley Research Center company and Textron company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NASA Langley Research Center company and Textron company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NASA Langley Research Center and Textron, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NASA Langley Research Center and Textron, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NASA Langley Research Center or Textron ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NASA Langley Research Center or Textron ?
Between NASA Langley Research Center and Textron, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NASA Langley Research Center and Textron, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA