Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NARS CosmeticsNARS Cosmetics
VS
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
NARS Cosmetics

NARS Cosmetics

390 Madison Ave, New York, 10017, US

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile
764/1000Fair

Makeup artist. Photographer. Iconoclast. Creative visionary François Nars launched NARS Cosmetics with 12 iconic lipsticks in 1994. Today, he continues to inspire self-expression and imaginative artistry through his rule-breaking philosophy of beauty. NARS’ boundary-p...

NAICS:32562
NAICS Definition:Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees:1,547
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

767 5th Ave, New York, NY, US, 10153

Last Update: 23/07/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.elcompanies.com
577/1000Very Poor

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. is one of the world’s leading manufacturers, marketers, and sellers of quality skin care, makeup, fragrance, and hair care products, and is a steward of outstanding luxury and prestige brands globally. The company’s products are sold in a...

NAICS:32562
NAICS Definition:Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees:52,420
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NARS Cosmetics

NARS Cosmetics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NARS Cosmetics in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. has 188.46% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - NARS Cosmetics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NARS Cosmetics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NARS Cosmetics

NARS Cosmetics

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CHE1784787889
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE1783960835
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BROBECTHEORAABB1773750615

FAQ

Between NARS Cosmetics company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NARS Cosmetics company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NARS Cosmetics company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NARS Cosmetics company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NARS Cosmetics company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NARS Cosmetics company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NARS Cosmetics company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NARS Cosmetics company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NARS Cosmetics company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NARS Cosmetics company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NARS Cosmetics company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NARS Cosmetics and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NARS Cosmetics and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NARS Cosmetics or The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NARS Cosmetics or The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. ?
Between NARS Cosmetics and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NARS Cosmetics and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1