Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

National Aquaculture Group | NAQUANational Aquaculture Group | NAQUA
VS
MarsMars
National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA

National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA

Al Maah Street, Al Laith, undefined, undefined, SA

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.naqua.com.sa
754/1000Fair

National Aquaculture Group is one of the largest aquaculture operation of its type in the world & offers you the opportunity to enjoy products grown in our farms strategically located by the coast of the Red Sea in Saudi Arabia. The 16 farms for shrimp and 3 circula...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:1,062
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Mars

Mars

6885 Elm St, McLean, Virginia, US, 22101

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.mars.com
810/1000Good

We’re a unified force of 170,000+ Associates, taking action every day toward the world we want tomorrow. Our Five Principles have kept us true to ourselves and to our commitment to treat others in ways that are consistent with those values. Having stood the test of ti...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:64,115
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA

National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mars

Mars

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mars in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mars (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mars cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA

National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Mars

Mars

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA company and Mars company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA company and Mars company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA company and Mars company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA company and Mars company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA company and Mars company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA company and Mars company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA company and Mars company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA company and Mars company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA company and Mars company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA company and Mars company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA company and Mars company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA and Mars, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA and Mars, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA or Mars ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA or Mars ?
Between National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA and Mars, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between National Aquaculture Group | NAQUA and Mars, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2